Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Latin American Revolutions syllabus, Fall 2013

Latin American Revolutions: Causes, Consequences, Myths and Memories

Professor Patrick Iber
Fall 2013 / Wed. 10-12AM / 3104 Dwinelle

This course will examine the causes, consequences, and legacies of Latin America’s major revolutions of the twentieth century. It will focus on the violent social revolutions of Mexico, Cuba, and Nicaragua, as well as equally important experiments in social change in Guatemala, Chile, and contemporary Venezuela. We will put these revolutions in comparative perspective, and use more personal reflections made through memoirs and film to examine their effects on people who experienced them.  We will try to understand what why these revolutions occurred, what they changed in the societies that experienced them, and in what ways they satisfied and disappointed those who fought for change.

Course requirements

Your grade will be based on the following:

20% participation. Active participation in class is essential; our learning will be richest as more of you become involved in the conversation and debate. You should complete all readings before we meet, attend very week, and be an active participant in discussion. If you know in advance that you will miss a day, you should clear it with the instructor by email. Since we will be a large class, it is important to note that your participation will be esteemed on the basis of its quality, courtesy, and thoughtfulness, not on its quantity.

20% weekly responses. Each week you should bring a brief written response, on the order of 250-350 words, to class. Use that space to reflect on the most significant ideas of the reading, or that which you found most surprising or puzzling. You should end your paragraphs by posing a question that you would like to take up during class. These assignments will be collected and given a credit / no credit mark. You can skip one week without penalty.

20% Short paper. Prompts for a short, 4-5-page paper based on the early readings will be distributed in class on October 2nd. It will be due in class the following week, October 9th.

40% final paper, 8-10 pages. Your final paper will be short research paper, of between 2000 and 2500 words. You should consult books and articles outside of those used in class with the goal of exploring in depth a topic related to the major themes of the class. A brief paragraph explaining your plans for the final are due in class on November 27th. For those students expecting to enroll in a History 101 course this spring or next year, you may choose to write a paper prospectus instead of this research paper. The prospectus should lay out the major question of your research, the primary sources you will consult, and begin to address the historiography on the topic. If you are planning to choose this option instead of the research paper, you should talk directly with the instructor in advance. The final papers are due on December 18th.

Course texts:

John Womack, Zapata and the Mexican Revolution, New York, Vintage, 1970, $19.

Gil Joseph and Jürgen Buchenau, Mexico’s Once and Future Revolution: Social Upheaval and the Challenge of Rule since the Late Nineteenth Century, Durham: Duke University Press, 2013, $20. Please note that this book will be published on September 4, 2013.

Stephen Schlesinger and Stephen Kinzer, Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala, Boston: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, 2005, $21.

Nick Cullather, Secret History: The CIA’s Classified Account of Its Operations in Guatemala 1952-1954, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006, $19.

Aviva Chomsky, A History of the Cuban Revolution, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, $20.

Reynaldo Arenas, Before Night Falls: A Memoir, New York: Penguin, 1994, $16.

Peter Winn, Weavers of Revolution: The Yarur Workers and Chile’s Road to Socialism, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, $45.

Stephen Kinzer, Blood of Brothers: Life and War in Nicaragua, Boston: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, 2007, $18.

Gioconda Belli, The Country Under my Skin: A Memoir of Love and War, New York: Anchor, 2003, $17.

George Ciccariello-Maher, We Created Chávez: A People’s History of the Venezuelan Revolution, Durham: Duke University Press, 2013.

Francisco Toro and Juan Cristobal Nagel, Blogging the Revolution: Caracas Chronicles and the Hugo Chávez Era, Cognitio, 2013, $25. (I recommend the Kindle edition at $9.)

To get good advice on what I will be looking for from your reading and writing, I recommend the following resources:

Readings

Week 1, September 4: Framework and Introduction to the Course

To read and discuss during class:

Alan Knight, “Social Revolution: A Latin American Perspective,” Bulletin of Latin American Research 9, no. 2 (1990): 175-202.


Week 2, September 11: Mexico, Week 1

Womack, Zapata and the Mexican Revolution


Week 3, Sep. 18: Mexico, Week 2

Gil Joseph and Jurgen Buchenau, Mexico’s Once and Future Revolution

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS BOOK WILL BE PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2013, AND MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE IMMEDIATELY.


Week 4, Sep. 25:

Schlesinger and Kinzer, Bitter Fruit


Week 5, Oct. 2:

Nick Cullather, Secret History


Week 6, Oct. 9: Che:

Short paper due in class. There is no additional reading this week.

Movie in class: The Motorcycle Diaries



Week 7, Oct 16: Cuba, Part I

Aviva Chomsky, A History of the Cuban Revolution



Week 8, Oct 23: Cuba, Part II

Reynaldo Arenas, Before Night Falls



Week 9, Oct 30: Chile

Peter Winn, Weavers of Revolution



Week 10, Nov 6: Nicaragua, Part I

Stephen Kinzer, Blood of Brothers



Week 11, Nov 13: Nicaragua, Part II

Giaconda Belli, The Country Under My Skin


Week 12, Nov. 20: Venezuela, Part I

George Cicchariello-Maher, We Created Chávez



Week 13, Nov. 27: Venezuela, Part I [Wednesday before Thanksgiving]

Frontline Documentary: The Hugo Chávez Show

If you cannot make it to class, you should watch the documentary online at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hugochavez/view/

Final paper plans due.



Week 14, Dec. 4: Venezuela, Part II

Jon Lee Anderson, “Slumlord,” New Yorker, 28 January 2013, pp. 40-51.

Francisco Toro and Juan Cristóbal Nagel, Blogging the Revolution, [selections]



Final papers due December 18th.

Modern Latin America syllabus, Fall 2013

Fall 2013 syllabus for U.C. Berkeley's History 8B: Modern Latin America (with emails removed, etc.). I want my students to read good prose, especially in introductory courses like this one; after finishing, I realized that the nineteenth-century title for this class would be "Modern Latin America, or, writing about Latin America that originally appeared in the New Yorker."



HISTORY 8B
Modern Latin America

Professor Patrick Iber
Fall 2013 / MWF 1-2 / 150 GSPP


This course will give a broad overview of Latin American history from the pre-colonial era to the present day.  Particular emphasis will be placed on the socioeconomic, cultural, and political structures and processes that shaped and continue to influence life in Latin America.  Key issues such as colonialism, nationalism, democracy, and revolution will be examined critically in light of broad comparative themes in Latin American and world history.  Course materials include secondary sources in history, economics, political science, and sociology as well as primary documents, fiction, and film in order to provide insight into the complex and diverse history of the region.  Among the topics to be explored in detail will be labor and slavery, the Mexican and Cuban revolutions, and the transition from dictatorship to democracy.

Course texts:

Alexander Dawson, Latin America Since Independence: A History with Primary Sources, New York: Routledge, 2010, $49.

Alma Guillermoprieto. Looking for History: Dispatches from Latin America.  New York: Vintage, 2002, $17.

Sandra Lauderdale Graham, Caetana says No: Women’s Stories from a Brazilian Slave Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, $28.

Mariano Azuela, The Underdogs, New York: Penguin Classics, 2008, $10.

Daniel Wilkinson, Silence on the Mountain: Stories of Terror, Betrayal, and Forgetting in Guatemala, Durham: Duke University Press, 2004, $24.

Lawrence Weschler, A Miracle, A Universe: Settling Accounts with Torturers, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, $20.





Course requirements

Your grade will be based on the following:

25% section. Active participation in class is essential; our learning will be richest as more of you become involved in the conversation and debate.  Therefore, all readings must be completed before you meet in section, and you should attend every week. You can miss one day without arranging an absence with us; additional absences should be cleared with your GSI in advance. Each week, you should post a half-page response to the readings on the class’s bspace page. Your post should go up by midnight of the day before your section, so that your GSI can read the responses before class. Your reading responses will not be graded assignments, but they will, in combination with your participation, be used to determine your section grade. Unless your GSI gives you specific instructions otherwise, your response might take one of two forms. One option would be to write a brief examination of what you think the most important arguments of that week’s texts are, and to defend your position. A second option would be to explore the parts of the readings that you found most puzzling: what questions they raise for you, how you tried to resolve them, and what more you would like to know in order to be able to complete that process.

5% map quiz. There will be a map quiz in week 3 of the course. A list of what you should know will be available on bspace.

40% papers. Twice during the semester, a short essay prompt will be distributed. You will have one week to respond, drawing from course readings and lectures.

30% final exam. The final exam is scheduled for December 18th, from 7-10 P.M. The exam will cover materials from section, lectures, and especially the readings.

Other than the main texts, course readings will be available through the bspace website.

To get good advice on what I will be looking for from your reading and writing, I recommend the following resources:





Week 1: Introduction and Colonial Inheritances

Friday, Aug. 30: Introduction to the course
Monday, Sep. 2: No classes
Wednesday, Sep. 4: Making the colonial order
Friday, Sep 6: Challenging the colonial order: from rebellions to the Napoleonic Wars

Dawson, Latin American Since Independence, Introduction and Chapters 1 and 2, pp. 1-57

Questions to consider this week:
1) What defines Latin America? Does it even exist?

2) Why did Latin America become independent from Spain?  How did caudillos solve the problem of trying to rule the newly independent countries?


Week 2: Race, Labor, and Society in the Nineteenth Century

M, Sep 9: Categories of Labor in the Nineteenth Century
W, Sep 11: Categories of Race
F, Sep 13: Legacies of Race: Film: Brazil in Black and White

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 3, pp. 59-80

Sandra Lauderdale Graham, Caetana Says No, xix-xxii, and then choose either of the two stories to read in depth

“Brazil’s Racial Identity Challenge,” New York Times, 29 March 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/03/29/brazils-racial-identity-challenge


Questions to consider this week:

1) How are ideas about race different in Mexico and Brazil?

2) How are ideas about race different in Brazil and the United States? Can the same methods be used in both places to address a history of discrimination on the basis of race?


Week 3: Politics and Development in the Nineteenth Century

M, Sep 16: The Great Divergence: Growth and its Absence
W, Sep 18: Ideologies of Development: Liberalism, Conservatism, and Positivism
F, Sep 20: Immigration and Nineteenth-Century Globalization

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 4, pp. 82-107

John Coatsworth, “Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth-Century Mexico,” American Historical Review 83, no. 1 (February 1978): 80-100.

Kenneth L. Sokoloff and Stanley L. Engerman, “History Lessons: Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, no. 3 (Summer 2000): 217-232.

Map quiz in class on Friday this week.

Questions to consider this week:

1) What are some of the traditional reasons given to explain Latin American underdevelopment?

2) What kind of evidence contradicts and supports those theories?


Week 4: Mexico and its Revolution

M, Sep 23: Film: The Storm that Swept Mexico [selections]
W, Sep 25: The Popular Revolution: Madero, Villa, and Zapata
F, Sep 27: The Victorious & Institutional Revolution: Carranza, Calles & Cárdenas

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 5, pp. 109-135

Azuela, The Underdogs

Prompts for the first, short essay (~3 pages, 700-800 words) will be distributed this week.

Questions to consider this week:

1) What contending groups and visions contributed to the Mexican Revolution?  How does this diversity affect how we think about the “legacy” on the Revolution?

2) Why did ordinary people join the Revolution?



Week 5: Arts and Culture in Post-Revolutionary Mexico

M, Sep 30: New Nationalism, New Art
W, Oct 2: The Rupture
F, Oct 4: First paper due in class; we will then take a walk to the Stern Hall Rivera mural
           
There is no reading this week so that you can work on the first paper.


Week 6: Latin America and the World to Midcentury

M, Oct 7: The Monroe Doctrine and Beyond
W, Oct 9: The Good Neighbor Policy
F, Oct 11: World War II and the Cold War

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 6, pp. 136-161

Wilkinson, Silence on the Mountain, 1-189

Questions to consider for this week:

1) What role has the U.S. played in shaping the politics of Latin America in the 20th century?  If the U.S. had not played that role, how would the region be different?

2) Is there an underlying consistency to U.S. policy towards Latin America, or have the decisions of individual administrations made a difference?

Week 7: Nationalism and Populism

M, Oct 14: Getúlio Vargas in Brazil
W, Oct 16: Juan Domingo Perón in Argentina
F, Oct 18: Jacobo Arbnez in Guatemala

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 7, pp. 162-187

Selections from The Argentina Reader
            Daniel James, “Perón and the People,” 269-295
            Tomás Eloy Martínez, “Saint Evita,” 296-303
            Victoria Ocampo, “Victorian Fathers,” 313-318
            Julio Cortázar, “House Taken Over,” 328-332

Guillermoprieto, Looking for History, “Little Eva,” 3-17

Questions to consider this week:
1) What is populism?  How does it differ from other strategies for governing?

2) How was gender (including ideas of both masculinity and femininity) used as part of Perón’s populist strategy?

Week 8: Cuba and its Revolution

M, Oct 21: Film: Fidel Castro
W, Oct 23: The Achievements of the Revolution
F, Oct 25: The Costs of the Revolution

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 8, pp. 188-218

Selections from The Cuba Reader
            How the Poor Got More, 344-353
            Fish à la Grande Jardinière, Humberto Arenal, 354-362
            The Literacy Campaign, Oscar Lewis et al., 389-394
           
Guillermoprieto, Looking for History, “The Harsh Angel,” 73-86, “Fidel in the Evening,” 126-152

José Manuel Prieto, “The Cuban Revolution Explained to Taxi Drivers,” http://www.thenation.com/article/travels-taxi-reflections-cuba

Questions to consider this week:
1) What were the principal causes of the Cuban Revolution?

2) Were the sacrifices imposed on ordinary people necessary to achieve the gains of the Revolution?

Week 9: Democracy to Dictatorship

M, Oct 28: Film: La Batalla de Chile
W, Oct 30: Democratic Breakdowns: Brazil, Chile, and Argentina
F, Nov 1: Dictatorships in Power: Brazil, Chile, and Argentina

Lawrence Weschler, A Miracle, A Universe: Settling Accounts with Torturers, pp. 1-172

Questions to consider this week:

1) How did Latin American dictatorships justify their actions? Who did they consider to be their enemies?

2) Why do ordinary people support dictatorships?


Week 10: The Second Cold War: Central America

M, Nov 4: Genocide in Guatemala
W, Nov 6: Uprising in El Salvador
F, Nov 8: Revolution in Nicaragua

Daniel Wilkinson, Silence on the Mountain, pp. 190-359

An essay prompt will be distributed on Friday. It will be 5-6 pages, based on lectures and readings through week 10.

Questions to consider this week:

1) What factors separated successful revolutions from unsuccessful ones?

2) Why did people become guerrillas? Why did they join the armies that fought them?


Week 11: Dictatorship to Democracy, Week I

M, Nov 11: NO CLASS
W, Nov 13: Film in class: No
F, Nov 15: Film in class: No

Essay due in class on Friday, November 15th.


 Week 12: Dictatorship to Democracy, Week II

M, Nov 18: Resisting Dictatorship
W, Nov 20: Legacies of Dictatorship, including selections from Nostalgia for the Light
F, Nov 22: The “Perfect Dictatorship”: Mexico

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapters 9 & 10, pp. 221-276

Weschler, A Miracle, A Universe, pp. 173-246

Guillermoprieto, Looking for History
            The Bitter Education of Vargas Llosa, 155-177
            The Only Way to Win, 224-238
            The Peso, 275-285
            Elections 2000, 286-303

Questions to consider this week:

1) Why do people who had supported dictatorships turn against them?

2) How did the process of achieving democracy differ in Brazil, Peru, and Mexico?



Week 13: Thanksgiving Week

M, Nov 25: Film: Frontline: The Hugo Chávez Show
W, Nov 27: Film: The Hugo Chávez Show
F, Nov 29: NO CLASS

If you are unable to make it to class this week, on either or both days, you should watch the documentary on your own time at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hugochavez/view/



Week 14: Neoliberalism and its Discontents: Latin America Today

M, Dec 2: Social Democracy or Democratic Socialism?
W, Dec 4: Limits and Fissures in the “Pink” Decade
F, Dec 6: Summing Up

Dawson, Latin America Since Independence, Chapter 11, pp. 277-311

Jorge G. Castañeda, “Latin America’s Left Turn,” Foreign Affairs, May/June 2006, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/61702/jorge-g-castaneda/latin-americas-left-turn

Jon Lee Anderson, “Slumlord,” New Yorker, 28 January 2013, pp. 40-51.

Greg Grandin, “On the Legacy of Hugo Chávez,” The Nation, 5 March 2013, http://www.thenation.com/article/173212/legacy-hugo-chavez

Questions to consider this week:

1) How do we explain the strength of the left in the first decade of the twenty-first century?  How is this left different from that of the twentieth century?

2) What conditions have allowed recent governments to deliver growth with equity?


Week 15: Reading Week

Dec 9-13, No Classes

Information about review sessions will be distributed.


Week 16: Finals week

FINAL EXAM SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, DEC 18, 7-10PM.



Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Managing Mexico's Cold War: Vicente Lombardo Toledano and the Uses of Political Intelligence

I have a short article in the Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research as part of a special dossier on the use of Mexican secret police archives for writing the contemporary history of Mexico, a project edited by Louise Walker and Tanalís Padilla. We were limited in our word count, and all of the authors were tasked with taking a document or two and explained their content for the audience. I was brought in to the project to talk about the ways that the documents shed light on international issues, and did my analysis on Vicente Lombardo Toledano, a Marxist labor leader with ties to multiple foreign intelligence agencies. I therefore tried to do my analysis in the context of a larger argument, namely, that,
Both before and after the creation of the [Dirección Federal de Seguridad], the Mexican government often tolerated the espionage games of rival foreign powers. Lombardo’s story alone has exhibited different forms of acceptance for the presence of U.S., Soviet, German, and British agents, operating with relative impunity. Someone like Lombardo could finance his political ambitions with dollars from the Mexican and Soviet governments, while at the same time the DFS could collaborate closely with its U.S. counterparts in pursuit of the neutralization of threats from the extreme left. In more general terms, the DFS could make itself valuable by sharing relevant information with U.S. agencies, at times even acting as a intelligence subcontractor reporting directly to them. But elsewhere, as with the Soviet Union, the DFS took a laissez faire attitude toward the actions of other intelligence services operating within the country. In later years, this was also true of Cuba:  the head of the DFS in the 1960s was a close associate of Fidel Castro’s. Like its subsidies to the domestic quasi-opposition that spanned the political spectrum from right to left without constituting endorsement, Mexican tolerance of foreign espionage constituted a kind of subsidy that left governments as diverse as the Soviet Union, the United States, and Cuba with an interest in the maintenance of Mexico’s government in power. Mexico’s secret police could be, without question, agents of repression for Mexico domestically. Yet in a different way, at the international level, they helped channel the nature of foreign intervention and manage the dangers of the Cold War to Mexico. Mexico ceded just enough sovereignty to foreign spies that it, in the end, lost very little.
The whole dossier is fully available online, for free, through the end of August 2013.

A Diplomatic History of Mexican Diplomacy

My review of Roberta Lajous Vargas's "Las relaciones exteriores de México (1821-2000)," is up at Letras Libres. I wrote in Spanish, so there's no English version to post here, but the basic argument is that this is a fine textbook but quite official. It doesn't get into cultural diplomacy, nor does it engage the ugly little compromises that made Mexican diplomacy possible. The section on the Porfiriato is very strong, but on the twentieth century:
[L]a narrativa de unidad y triunfo frente a los retos del siglo XX no ha dejado espacio para examinar las concesiones creativas que se requirieron. No es necesario poner en duda el antifascismo de Lázaro Cárdenas para admitir que su gobierno, al igual que el de su sucesor Manuel Ávila Camacho, mantuvieron canales de comunicación con el Eje después de la nacionalización del petróleo. Los pilotos del Escuadrón 201 podrían ser héroes nacionales, pero también fueron utilizados para que México asegurara que su influencia después de la segunda guerra fuera mayor que la que tuvo después de la primera, donde no luchó. Asimismo, durante la Guerra Fría más de un presidente mexicano fue señalado como agente de la CIA. (“Yo, hasta la fecha, no he podido sacarle un centavo a esa punta de cabrones”, le dijo Gustavo Díaz Ordaz a Ricardo Garibay, quien había aceptado dinero de alguien de quien sospechaba era un oficial de la agencia de inteligencia.) La lista es extensa en ironías y el punto no es que estas contradigan la historia oficial de la diplomacia mexicana. Al contrario, la nutren mostrando las sucias concesiones que permitían a México permanecer soberano ante la sombra del imperio del norte, la URSS –que tanto quiso a México como base de espionaje– o la Cuba revolucionaria. Que esos tres países quedaran contentos con el régimen del PRI es una hazaña casi única en el siglo XX, pero es algo que no se logra sin creatividad ni ironías. Como historia de las relaciones diplomáticas oficiales de México, este libro tiene un gran valor. Pero para profundizar nuestro conocimiento del tema, también se necesitará una historia menos diplomática de la diplomacia mexicana. Quizás cuando la autora deje el servicio diplomático tenga más historias para contar.

Playa Juan Dolio, 2013

At the Playa Juan Dolio, Dominican Republic, 2013.

Santo Domingo, 2013

My son ponders the wires and buildings of Santo Domingo, summer 2013.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

A book announcement

I'm very pleased to be able to announce that my book is under contract with Harvard University Press. The book will explore the contested meanings of socialism, democracy, and intellectual responsibility in the cultural Cold War in Latin America. My working title is The Disenchantment of the Word: The Cultural Cold War in Latin America. I promise to include famous people behaving badly, spies, and interesting works of art.